The naming schema between GeoAPI implementation classes is inconsistent between metadata and referencing module. I would like to rename the metadata classes for consistency, replacing "Impl" suffix by "Default" or "Abstract" prefix. I realize that this is a very cosmetic issue (absolutly no change in functionalities); I see it as part of an effort for trying to put a little bit of order in the GeoTools code base...
Proposal page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Naming+policy+for+GeoAPI+implementation+classes Comment? Objections? Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
