That is correct; and the reason the 2.2-M1 milestone was made (to give GeoTools 2.5.x branch something stable to track).
Cheers, Jody Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > perhaps a topic for the IRC meeting but if the geoserver folk are not > going to be around, then I'd like clarification by email. > > Can we work on the assumption that Geotools 2.5 has its GeoAPI in the > 2.2-M1 milestone? That is, can we update GeoAPI with no concern > whatsoever for the Gt 2.5 branchbut concern only for trunk? > > Certain things need to change in the geometry interfaces and I'd like to > understand the consequences of those changes. > > --adrian > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
