Jody, it has been brought to my attention that, for compliance with even level zero of the simple features profile, we need to support xs:complexType/xs:simpleContent types such as gml:MeasureType and gml:CodeType [See 8.4.4.1, p14, "Geography Markup Language (GML) simple features profile" (OGC 06-049r1)]. I do not see how we can do this in GeoAPI 2.2 without ugly hacks.
Kind regards, Ben. Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Jody we had this discussion a couple times now and you keep telling we can > model an xs:complexType with xs:simpleContent as a ComplexAttribute but I > keep not seeing it that easy. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
