Rob Atkinson wrote: > Also, I couldnt find a binding for gml:name, so not sure how to add > gml:identifier. What is supposed to be happening here - is it simply > handled as a complex feature type generic binding?
Rob, gml:name is a gml:CodeType; this is a complexType with simpleContent, so is poorly supported by gt-xsd-gml3, as previously discussed on the list. This type is bound in GMLSchema as a ComplexType: public static final ComplexType CODETYPE_TYPE = new ComplexTypeImpl( new NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml", "CodeType"), Collections.EMPTY_LIST, false, false, Collections.EMPTY_LIST, XSSchema.STRING_TYPE, null); There is nowhere to store the simple content (string in this case), because the value of a complex attribute is a Collection. In app-schema I create a fake simpleContent attribute with the appropriate binding type to store the simple content. This is implemented in XPath; http://svn.geotools.org/trunk/modules/unsupported/app-schema/app-schema/src/main/java/org/geotools/data/complex/filter/XPath.java This is an Ugly Hack (TM). GMLConfiguration will in the future look for this content and unpack it at encoding time. Yuck. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel