Hi Rob, So I took at look at the gml 3.2 patch you have been working on. And I think to handle it cleanly it needs some modifications. Essentially creating the "internal" version of the schema properly. Which actually is a major pain due the circular dependencies from gml on the iso schemas (gmd,gss, ect...).
Anyways, i was successfully able to use the code generator to generate the internal schema, and with some hacks able to work around the circular dependency. After that it is more or less easy. Just create a binding configuration which imports a bunch of the gml 3.1 bindings, but using the gml 3.2 namespace. And that should give you the foundation you need to parse gml 3.2. I added a test case that successfully parses a feature collection. To move forward past this we need to figure out what types in gml you actually want to handle... and how you want to map them to java objects that we have. I have not committed just yet, i actually have to go catch a flight this moment and have some minor clean-up tasks to do. But I will commit tomorrow. -Justin -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
