The tag would be ideal, so the version numbers on the docs would match. but a snapshot of 2.5.x should suffice too.
Jody Garnett wrote: > I will start the process here; I have had some success in the past. I > will update 2.5.x and build; will that be sufficient or do you really > want the tag? > Jody > > Justin are the javadocs changing that much between point releases? We > should work > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Adrian Custer <acus...@gmail.com > <mailto:acus...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 16:04 -0700, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > So I guess I will throw it out to other people. > > Could someone else try generating them. Remember it takes java 6 and > > apparently a non mac os. > > > > -Justin > > tried and failed; don't know the magic incantation. > > --adrian > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
