Hello Mickael I made a very first draft of documentation here:
http://geotidy.geomatys.fr/apidocs/org/geotools/coverage/processing/package-summary.html#package_description It still insuffisient since Hudson trigged its build (at fixed time) before I could complete more. But we could try to improve on it by iterative work; if you could ask me questions, I could try to answer in that documentation. Later on I will ask Adrian to help me fix my bad English. In this draft I made an attempt to find more appropriate class name: GeoTools 2.x name Proposed new name ----------------- ------------------------ AbstractProcessor AbstractCoverageProcessor AbstractOperation AbstractCoverageOperation Operation2D GridCoverageOperation2D OperationJAI GridCoverageOperationJAI The intend is to put in the name what the operation work on ("Coverage" or "GridCoverage"). However I'm not sure that it is a good idea since OperationJAI for example could be generalized in a future version (JAI can works on RenderableImage in addition of RenderedImage). So I'm a little bit tempted to stick with the old names. Opinion? Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
