Christian Müller wrote: > To tell it one sentence ( I looked at 2.5.x) > > That could not work. And actually it does not, I wrote a test case. > > Btw, the containsAll (Collection <?>) uses in case of a FeatureCollection > containsAll<FeatureCollecton <?,?>, which always returns false. > > I am wondering that nobody has used this method, or he was very lucky. I suspect the latter. The FeatureCollection interface has never really been implemented fully, properly, or cleanly.
My first attempt at doing so was ContentFeatureCollection, which is strict about soley being a convenience wrapper around a FeatureSource. And actually it does not support the containsAll method. Realted note: there is a proposal still open to basically create one FeatureCollection implement once and for all which follows this pattern: http://geotools.codehaus.org/FeatureCollection+clean+up Still on my back burner... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
