I would be content with 7 as well; would you like to make a motion and we can update the developers guide?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I personally find the GeoServer directions sensible, voting is >> easier when the number of people is small, but not too small. >> For a project with 90+ modules the current 5 members is certainly >> a bit small, hard to get enough people to cover all point of views, >> yet going over 7 may make things hard to manage. >> Anyways, this is my personal opinion. Once we have the PMC back >> in shape we can make a improvement proposal to provide more >> details and expectantions on the PMC itself, eventually borrowing >> some of what worked for GeoServer. > > I share this point of view as well. Allowing the PMC to grow too large sort > of defeats its purpose imo. And since module maintainers have enough of a > voice does not seem necessary. Lucky number 7 seems like a good size. >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> > > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
