Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Just a quick thanks to Andrea organizing[1] us through the reassigning > of module ownership. Andrea I have this evening and next free in order > to start working on that plan. I was trying to determine if the web > page or recent emails represented the final breakdown.
Afaik it was. I asked maintainers that stepped up to update the pom files, someone already did. I did not see any reason for a holdup since no module was claimed by developers in conflict with each other. > I feel that after this clean up is done it will be the correct time to > issue a news item or other formal response to geotoolkit. Indeed, the cleanup was the preliminary step in my mind. > Would anyone else be up for a "work party" in either going through > Andrea's plan; or in drafting a news item. Both activities require a > bit of a careful hand :-) What kind of work do you think is missing? I'm waiting on some feedback on the modules to be removed, if nothing comes up I'll go and delete them unless I receive a -1 on any module in the list. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
