+1 for the reports. Especially the cobertura reports are useful for examining the test coverage.
Concerning the build resources. I have to find a solution for the ibm hudson, perhaps we can run the "mvn site" on the ibm hudson box. Andrea Aime writes: > Hi, > I've been playing a bit trying to generate the maven > site, which was reported as non buildable, and non > fixable too. > > In fact, at the moment, the generation fails solid, or to be > more precise, enters an infinite loop. > > I tracked that down to an interaction between > javadoc aggregation and the site plugin, it is > sufficient to upgrade the two plugins, turn off > javadoc aggregation and the site generation > works. Which is not that bad, since recent javadoc > plugin version have a separate goal, javadoc:aggreate, > to perform javadoc aggregation anyways. > > The resulting site has however broken links between > parent and child modules. This one was due to > the <url> tags located in each module, that forced > the child links to the wrong url. After that is > removed, the site generated with a deploy is fully > linked (one generated with just "mvn site" never is, > and that is aknowledged by the maven site guide). > > Even reaching this point, the generated site has > customizations that point to geotools.fr, those > can be killed by removing the site.xml present > in most modules src/site directory. > > Finally, even with that, the report generated > is not very interesting. I've tried to cut > down the repetitions (do you want the ml to > be mentioned in each module?) and add some interesting > reports, such as cobertura code coverage > and findbugs. > > I still haven't tried to make a full build, > since those reports take _a long time_ to > generate, but I've made the site for the > library module (this alone took 13 minutes and > uses 267MB of space, uncompressed, roughly half > in cobertura reports and half in javadoc/jxr > ones) and I've made it available for you to look at > here: > http://atlas.openplans.org/~aaime/gtsite/index.html > > Would it be nice to have this report being > built daily? I guess so. > Yet, building for the whole project > might take 1-2 hours I fear, not sure > we have enough free cycles on the > build server to understake this. > I was thinking that once a week could > be good enough (but I don't have any > confirmation from OpenGeo in this direction > either). > > Anyways, what do you think? The site per-se > is as ugly as it gets, but the reports > seem valuable to me. > > Cheers > Andrea > > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
