Thanks Justin; Looks like you have hit everything; let me know when the transition is complete; I would like to make another GeoTools release since it has been a while and a lot of good fixes have made it in. If all goes well it can be used by the next GeoServer release.
Jody On 28/11/2009, at 10:10 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Pages added to the user guide: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/11+JDBC > > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Jody Garnett wrote: >>> That sounds like amazing progress! Finding a new driver for sql lite >>> is great :-) >>> >>> As for moving to supported; we can just walk through the checklist. >>> Providence review (is probably fine), documentation page (perhaps you >>> want to do sphinx rather then wiki?), code coverage is probably fine >>> and so on ... >>> >> Yup, I have created pages in the module matrix for these: >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/JDBC+MySQL >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/JDBC+SpatiaLite >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/JDBC+SQL+Server >> Lists the test coverage, ip review, etc... >> As for pages in the user guide I will probably just stick with the wiki >> since non of the user guide has been ported to sphinx yet. >>> Jody >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeol...@opengeo.org> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Over the weekend I spent some time working toward getting the rest of >>>> the jdbc plugins (based on the jdbc-ng architecture) to supported >>>> status. This includes: >>>> >>>> * sqlserver >>>> * mysql >>>> * spatialite >>>> >>>> The blockers for sqlserver and mysql where not utilizing any spatial >>>> indexing which made them sort of useless. And spatialite was a work in >>>> progress fighting with the jdbc driver for it. >>>> >>>> But i am happy to report that filter to sql encoders have been >>>> implemented for sql server and mysql so they now will utilize a spatial >>>> index. >>>> >>>> I am also happy to report that I found a much better jdbc driver for >>>> sqlite (http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC) and it is now >>>> working quite well. It also utilizes an sql encoder that makes use of >>>> spatial indexes. All jdbc test cases pass (with some exceptions to due >>>> to non transaction isolation) on both mac and linux. >>>> >>>> So I would like to move these three modules to supported status unless >>>> anyone objects. >>>> >>>> Comments? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Justin Deoliveira >>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >>>> on >>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>>> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>>> > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
