On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Interesting. >> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the >> bounds of the current feature? > How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-)
You asked about a "dynamic" scope that was a feature by feature basis; apparently "bounds" was not a good example. The question is can we do something to the substitution name to make it obvious when an environmental variable is dynamic or not? Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel