On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Interesting.
>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for the
>> bounds of the current feature?
> How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-)
You asked about a "dynamic" scope that was a feature by feature basis;
apparently "bounds" was not a good example.
The question is can we do something to the substitution name to make it obvious
when an environmental variable is dynamic or not?
Cheers,
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
