On 13/06/2010, at 5:19 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > My guess is that anybody using a CRS with DMS unit is actually storing > the data in decimal deegrees, and that providing actual support for > the DMS unit transformation would just result in confused users. > > 2150 is one of such codes, if I look at spatialreference.org they > are using deegree as well: > http://www.spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/2150/html/
I hate making assumptions with any of this stuff; any way to contact the spatialreference.org (or proj?) about this assumption to see if it common? > What about: > a) go down and just change the current behavior to just use > decimal degrees. Rationale: CRS with DMS are not usable anyways, > so we don't have backwards compatibility issues from that pov Any way we can only do that when lenient is true? > b) alternatively, add a flag to control the DMS/degree behavior. I would prefer to add a flag; even if the default value is true. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
