Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: > Hi all and sorry for cross-posting. > > I'd like to propose upgrading the version of h2database in the trunk > poms (both geoserver and geotools) to a newer version than the one > currently used. > > Situation is we've inadvertently been shipping geoserver with two h2 > jars, h2-1.1.104.jar and h2-1.1.119.jar. The former used by geotools and > geoserver, the later carried over as a transitive dependency from > geowebcache. > > I just discovered the problem while updating geoserver trunk to point to > geowebcache snapshot and got a compile error, since gwc now uses some h2 > connection pooling with some speed up benefits. > > Having talked to Andrea and Arne, we've seen that the h2 database format > doesn't change between those two versions, so, provided y update the > poms on both trunks to use 1.1.119 instead of 1.1.104 and the build > doesn't break, can I commit the version upgrade? any concern?
As you said, it looks like 119 and 104 share the same disk format, so if there is no regression in the build I don't see a problem with the upgrade Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
