If it helps we did look at EMF when we were designing our Feature Type model; 
you can find some crazy pages of design notes on the wiki if you want a fun 
drinking game (drink every time it says abstract).

In anycase you should find that the concepts line up nicely.

Jody 
-- 
Jody Garnett

On Wednesday, 13 April 2011 at 11:18 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: 
> Hi again, see update below.
> 
> 2011/4/13 Kenneth Gulbrandsoy <[email protected]>
> > 2011/4/13 Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
> > That looks like good fun Kenneth - +1 from me.
> > > 
> > > The next step is for me to make sure you have read the developers guide 
> > > (you have read the developers guide right?); and then ask you to send in 
> > > a code contribution agreement (the mailing address is included with the 
> > > form). 
> > 
> > I have read the developer guide yes, well most of it... Still a work in 
> > progress I guess :-)
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > When you tell me that is on the way we can go through getting you svn 
> > > access.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > OK.
> > 
> > > 
> > > You PDF is much more then we require in order to start an unsupported 
> > > module; hopefully you will keep some of that as documentation.
> > 
> > Yes. I'm going to document it further (part of my "materials and methods" 
> > section of my PhD :-)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Aside: I had actually though of doing a straight wrapper on to the EMF 
> > > model (ie rather than recreating feature and featuretype in EMF as you 
> > > have done); make a wrapper that translates feature.getAttribite( name ) 
> > > into a call for eobject.get( name ) etc...
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > That's an interesting approach. It would probably save memory for sure, 
> > which is critical in GIS. The actual mapping of EObjects to Features are 
> > not implented yet. My main concern have been the model structure mapping 
> > (EClass to SimpleFeatureType). I serialize each EFeatureInfo ("filtered 
> > EClass") into a feature specification string which DataUtilities use to 
> > create SimpleFeatureType instances from. Your suggestion does not conflict 
> > with this approach i think. I'll look into it. Thanks. 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Your approach looks good; and powerful. I would like to confirm (please) 
> > > that when you say your data structure is defined "same manner as in the 
> > > postgis module", can I check that you mean you are extending 
> > > ContentDataStore?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > What I mean is that the EFeature Model structure is organized in the same 
> > manner as PostGIS: Database (EFeatureDataStore) -> Folders (EFeatureFolder) 
> > -> Tables (EFeature). 
> > 
> > > I just want to make sure another project does not start off using 
> > > AbstractDataStore....
> > > 
> > 
> > GeoTools is very feature rich, I was not aware of the ContentDataStore. The 
> > EFeatureDataStore is based on AbstractDataStore... I'll look into 
> > ContentDataStore. 
> 
> Can't see any reason not to switch to ContentDataStore, Seems like 
> EFeatureDataStore == ContentDataStore and EFeatureFolder = ContentEntry.
> 
> > 
> > > Jody Garnett
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, 13 April 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy wrote: 
> > > > Hi geotools-devel list!
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Model-driven engineering (MDE) requires flexible tools for design and 
> > > > model instance generation. 
> > > > 
> > > > In the Eclipse world, EMF is one obvious choice, because of low 
> > > > probability of being discontinued anytime soon, and the many tools and 
> > > > extension like query, model validation, and persistence through 
> > > > CDO.However, when the modeling involves both dynamic and ad-hoc 
> > > > temporal and spatial data, EMF do not have any built-in support for 
> > > > geodata. 
> > > > 
> > > > My proposal is to add spatial support to EMF models using Geotools 
> > > > DataStore capabilities. 
> > > > 
> > > > A "short" argumentation and description of the module is attached. I'm 
> > > > adding this proposal to the RnD page shortly. 
> > > > 
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > 
> > > > Kenneth Gulbrandsøy
> > > >  - PhD student
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Department of Engineering Cybernetics
> > > > Norwegian University of Science and Technology
> > > > + mob: +47 932 58 930
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >  Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and 
> > > > minutes
> > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report 
> > > > as
> > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> > > >  Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and 
> > > > vision.
> > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Geotools-devel mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> > > > 
> > > > Attachments:
> > > > - geotools-module-proposal.pdf
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Kenneth
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Kenneth 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
> not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
> part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
> Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
> Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to