On 30 May 2011 10:50, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > You have a +1 for the module so no need to wait on our account. > Indeed it is safer for you if commit now, and just not include your module > in the unsupported/pom.xml until you are happy? > Jody
Hi Jody and Kenneth, If the module builds without error it would probably be OK to include it in the modules within the "unsupported" profile section of the pom - what do you think ? Actually, I just checked the pom and wonder why there are so many separate profiles ? For instance, coveragetools is in "pending" with no activation, as well as "raster" which activates on -Dall. The epsg-h2 module has its own profile and is also included in the "unsupported" profile, both of which activate on -Dall. It looks like a bit of a dog's dinner in there :) Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
