On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Martin Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> An easy way to narrow the window of bad performance quite a bit more would
> be to do a point-in-poly check only if there were two or more candidate
> shells which could contain the hole (based on an envelope check).
> Currently a PIP is run against each candidate shell, even if there is
> turns out to only be a single candidate.
>
>
I'd say, open a ticket so that we don't lose the info and.. patches
welcomed :-)
(for once this does not require a test since it's a performance
optimization, we just need to make sure all the
existing tests still pass)
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
