I chose the same solution as you for the branch!
Using a List and then ListFeatureCollection.
I do want to see this applied shortly, I had some rebase troubles last night
making the pull request causing a few curses on IRC.
--
Jody
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Thursday, 1 November 2012 at 7:13, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Thanks Jody. A huge amount of work there !
>
> A while ago I updated the feature tutorial to avoid using
> FeatureCollection.add, but instead of using
> DefaultFeatureCollection.add I explicitly created a List to accumulate
> features and then wrapped that in a ListFeatureCollection when writing
> to the DataStore.
>
> At the time I asked if DefaultFeatureCollection.add is confusing given
> that users are being told FeatureCollections should be seen as views
> or result sets, not in-memory collections. It's kind of a mixed
> message isn't it ?
>
> Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
