Thanks Justin. I will create a JIRA issue and assign it to you for review when
it's ready.
From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:jdeol...@opengeo.org]
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2013 9:56 PM
To: Angreani, Rini (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: Geotools-Devel list
Subject: Re: uomLabels in gml 3.2
Hey Rini,
This sounds reasonable to me. I also notice a bunch of "FIXME" labels in that
binding... perhaps separating it can resolve those as well.
-Justin
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM,
<rini.angre...@csiro.au<mailto:rini.angre...@csiro.au>> wrote:
Hi Justin,
I am trying to get uomLabels to appear in LineString, based on GML 3.2:
http://schemas.opengis.net/gml/3.2.1/geometryBasic0d1d.xsd.
(Actually from GML 3.1.0 onwards).
I can see if I make changes to AbstractGeometryTypeBinding, it will create the
same problem with srsDimension (where it's not allowed with older GML).
So I was thinking, instead of doing this and make it configurable, I could just
create a new AbstractGeometryTypeBinding that handles uomLabels under
/gt-xsd-gml3/src/main/java/org/geotools/gml3/v3_2/bindings.
Please let me know what you think about this approach.
Thanks
Rini
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
