We do have an option of forking code into our codebase (especially if we
only use a couple classes). I am confused at how gwt-vecmath transitioned
to MIT license? Did they do a clear rewrite or get permission ... like they
keep the javax.vecmath package space and everything.

--
Jody Garnett

On 13 February 2015 at 11:59, Rich Fecher <rfec...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For GeoWave we are interested in moving dependencies to maven central and
> I was trying to track down various dependencies that are not on maven
> central.  Vecmath 1.3.1 is available but not vecmath 1.3.2.  If we are
> talking about replacing vecmath it would be very nice to choose a library
> that is on maven central, I don't think gwt-vecmath is on maven central if
> that is the proposed replacement.
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So Eric is the above breakdown useful? Our priorities are are accuracy
>> and speed :)
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 4 February 2015 at 19:55, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Let me try:
>>>
>>> *gt-metadata: *looks to just be data structure (Point3d and
>>> MismatchedSizeException)
>>>
>>> org.geotools.math.Line
>>> org.geotools.math.Plane
>>>
>>> *gt-referencing: *uses assorted exceptions, extends GMatrix, and
>>> Matrix3d/Matrix4d multiply
>>>
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.DefaultCoordinateOperationFactory
>>>
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.AdvancedAffineBuilder
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.AffineTransformBuilder
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.BursaWolfTransformBuilder
>>> - Imports GMatrix but does not use it
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.MathTransformBuilder
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.ProjectiveTransformBuilder
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.RubberSheetBuilder
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.builder.SimilarTransformBuilder
>>>
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.GeneralMatrix
>>> - extends GMatrix (this is the key integration point with vecmath)
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.Matrix1.java
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.Matrix2.java
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.Matrix3.java
>>> - uses Matrix3d.multiply
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.Matrix4.java
>>> - uses Matrix4d.multiply
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.matrix.XMatrix.java
>>>
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.transform.AbstractMathTransform
>>> org.geotools.referencing.operation.transform.ProjectiveTransform
>>>
>>> So it comes down to:
>>>
>>> * Extending GMatrix
>>> * delegating to Matricx3d multiply and Matrix4d.muiltiply
>>>
>>> So we are stuck going through the GMatrix methods and seeing which ones
>>> are called. Going to ignore things like constructors/equals/set/get (so we
>>> can focus on where the math is used)
>>> - GMatrix.add(GMatrix,GMatrix) - used by cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar (not sure
>>> what this is)
>>> - GMatrix.invert() - called by AdvancedAffineBuilder,
>>> BursaWolfTransformBuilderm ProjectiveTransformBuilder
>>> - GMatrix.mul(GMatrix) called by BursaWolfTransformBuilder, GeneralMatrix
>>> - GMatrix.mul(GMatrix,GMatrix) called by AdvancedAffineBuilder,
>>> BursaWolfTransformBuilder, ProjectiveTransformBuilder, ConcatenatedTransform
>>> - GMatrix.negate() called by AdvancedAffineBuilder,
>>> BursaWolfTransformBuilder
>>> - GMatrix.sub(GMatrix) called by MathTransformBuilderTest
>>> - GMatrix.sub(GMatrix,GMatrix) called by AdvancedAffineBuilder,
>>> BursaWolfTransformBuilder
>>> - GMatrix.transform() called by AdvancedAffineBuilder,
>>> BursaWolfTransformBuilder, ProjectiveTransformBuilder
>>>
>>>
>>> Not quite sure what to make of that .. looks like multiply, invert,
>>> negate, transform are our actual requirements.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 4 February 2015 at 18:58, Eric Engle <een...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've used almost all of those options at one time or another, but is
>>>> there a synopsis of the vecmath features that are actually used within
>>>> Geotools?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Tyler Battle <tbat...@boundlessgeo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to Jody, for pointing me at
>>>>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Replace+Vecmath
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone worked with any of these (or similar) libraries?
>>>>>
>>>>> When I have some free time, I'm going to try some of the drop-in
>>>>> (fingers crossed) replacements. If there isn't a loss in performance, this
>>>>> would be an easy short/medium term solution. Does anyone have any
>>>>> suggestions for testing the performance of these libs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Switching to a more specialized library or rolling our own is also an
>>>>> option. My expertise is very limited in this respect, so I'd need a lot of
>>>>> help if we want to consider this option.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Tyler Battle
>>>>>
>>>>> Software Engineer| Boundless
>>>>>
>>>>> tbat...@boundlessgeo.com <cami...@boundlessgeo.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Victoria, BC, Canada
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/boundlessgeo>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>>>>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media,
>>>>> is your
>>>>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>>>>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more.
>>>>> Take a
>>>>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>>>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>>>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
>>>> your
>>>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>>>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more.
>>>> Take a
>>>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
>> your
>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>> _______________________________________________
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to