If you use Jira, you have a workflow. I think Frank just wanted to be able to resolve an issue, which does not seem unreasonable to me. My small workflow tweak can enable a path to resolution for every issue, but is there a risk of destroying Jira? Do we need a backup first? Or just ignore it (sorry, Frank).
Kind regards, Ben. On 12/11/15 20:21, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Ben, > imho we should just forget about the workflow, to me it's just pointless > overhead. > No objections to have one if others feel the need to have one, but don't > think it might > have any meaning to those that perform gardening in jira in their spare time > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> > wrote: > >> Jody and Andrea, >> >> I have created an osgeo workflow and scheme but have not yet switched any >> projects to it. The new workflow removes "Patch Pending" and "With >> Customer". It differs from the old scheme by ensuring each of "Iteration", >> "Submitted", and "Analysis" have a transition back to "Open". >> >> - Please review this new osgeo workflow and advise whether we should >> switch. >> >> - The new workflow is inactive and we can still edit it. >> >> - Should we make an XML backup before the switch? >> >> I also fixed a type on a transition label in the existing workflow (unless >> "Interation" is some new jargon). >> >> Kind regards, >> Ben. >> >> >> On 12/11/15 12:37, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> >>> AFAICT uDig make extensive us of "Analysis", and we have one each in >>> GeoServer and GeoTools in "Submitted" for I suspect no good reason. >>> >>> On 12/11/15 12:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> >>>> Jody and Andrea, >>>> >>>> Frank has an issue that is in the Jira "Submitted" state. This state has >>>> no outgoing transitions and so cannot be modified, even by an >>>> administrator. Furthermore, because this state has no outgoing >>>> transitions, the workflow cannot be modified to add an outgoing >>>> transition (this is a Jira limitation). Instead the workflow must be >>>> copied and projects assigned to it. I could do this for the one state, >>>> but there are others that might benefit from care. >>>> >>>> I note the "Patch Pending", "With Customer", "Iteration", "Submitted", >>>> and "Analysis" statuses. Of these only "Iteration" has an outgoing >>>> transition (back to "Open"). "With Customer" has no transitions at all. >>>> Does anyone in uDig, GeoAPI, GeoServer, or GeoTools use or wish to use >>>> these statuses? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Ben. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/11/15 11:46, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>>> >>>>> Looking into it ... >>>>> >>>>> On 12/11/15 11:28, Frank Gasdorf wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope you can help me getting a submitted issue back to the normal >>>>>> JIRA >>>>>> workflow. >>>>>> >>>>>> The current state of https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5256 >>>>>> should be In progress and assigned to me. I pushed changes to 14.x and >>>>>> master already I'd like to change it to "resolved" >>>>>> >>>>>> Could an admin in JIRA please change the state. >>>>>> >>>>>> Much appreciated! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Frank >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> >> Director >> Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> >> New Zealand >> > > > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
