Good thinking. This will require more work, but will most likely be best
in the long term. We should probably deprecate the proposed Disposable
class as well for good measure.
Should we change all uses in GeoTools from dispose() to close()? This
makes sense but will be a widespread change with impact on pull requests
and future backports.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 07/06/18 10:41, Jody Garnett wrote:
You could swap this around, rename the dispose implementations to close,
and provide a deprecated default implementation of dispose that calls
close.
This way you can manage eventually remove dispose() from the API.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz>
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
