Is this not just a coordinate transformation challenge? That is defining a new reference system.
I do not think I understand why a new WFS plugin would be required as they are orthogonal concerns. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:28, Phil Scadden <p.scad...@gns.cri.nz> wrote: > Was at FOSS4G Oceania conference and went to very interesting talk on DGGS > spatial coordinates. I am guessing it will be a long time before this > becomes mainstream but I was wondering how difficult it would be for WFS > spatial queries to use a DGGS field in tables which also contained “normal” > geography field. Doing spatial queries against global databases (ie cant > use a projected coordinates system) around the poles and antemeridian is > tough. DGGS fixes the problem. Normal rendering code etc would be > unaffected. How easy would it be to do a replacement WFS plugin? > Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be > used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the > Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If > received in error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not > copy or disclose the contents. > _______________________________________________ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
