Hi Murry,

We have been busy for a bit with the foss4g-eu conference. Your
pull-request looks very interesting.
I will take discussion there, although I am not going to be the best person
to review.

If possible I would like to see this merged promptly, to be picked up in
the ImageN transition.
- -
Jody Garnett


On Jul 5, 2025 at 8:10:14 PM, Murray King <murrayhk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
> I’ve been happy with the results from the affine and first-order
> polynomial transforms. However, I was looking for a more flexible
> option—specifically a Thin Plate Spline (TPS) transformation—for handling
> more distorted imagery, such as hand-drawn plans etc.
>
> I’ve opened this PR that adds a TPS transform implementation . I’m happy
> to adapt the code as needed to align with project conventions—I’ve noticed
> patterns like builder usage in other areas.
> Or raise a jira ticket to tie it to the PR
> The implementation focuses on implementing the MathTransform interface.
>
> I’ve also included a real-world example testing in the gt-geotiff module,
> just for illustration. It’s not intended as a formal integration test, but
> rather a working demonstration using convenient dependencies.
>
> just pushed this PR https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5277
>
> I had to do this in my free time, because of weird government rules
> helping out with open source projects. But I'm happy to change anything. I
> see the MathTransform interface looks fairly stable but I don't want to do
> a local fix to leave the land register I am working with something they
> can't maintain in house.
>
> kind regards
>
> murray king.
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to