Hi!

I encountered really strange behaviour from the geotools 2-2 library when using 
an UTM (transform zone 31 north). With assertions enabled, transforming a WGS84 
geographical coordinate where the longitude is 0 throws the following exception:


java.lang.AssertionError: The transform result may be 0.095 meters away from 
the expected position. Are you sure that the input coordinates are inside this 
map projection area of validity? The point is located 3°00.0'W away from the 
central meridian and 63°00.0'N away from the latitude of origin.
        at 
org.geotools.referencing.operation.projection.MapProjection.checkTransform(MapProjection.java:506)
        at 
org.geotools.referencing.operation.projection.MapProjection.transform(MapProjection.java:643)
        at 
org.geotools.referencing.operation.projection.MapProjection.transform(MapProjection.java:678)



The above exception was generated using the coordinate 63.0N 0.0E and the 
transform:

PARAM_MT["Transverse_Mercator", 
  PARAMETER["semi_major", 6378137.0], 
  PARAMETER["semi_minor", 6356752.314245179], 
  PARAMETER["central_meridian", 3.0], 
  PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin", 0.0], 
  PARAMETER["scale_factor", 0.9996], 
  PARAMETER["false_easting", 500000.0], 
  PARAMETER["false_northing", 0.0]]


The really strange thing is that changing the longitude to 0.01 or -0.01 will 
not generate any assertions. Is my thinking totally stupid here or has anyone 
else encountered something similar.


Best regards,

-- sten


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to