Hi Martin, No that is not intended and is definitely a problem. I will fix this and upload a new binary release when i am done. Thanks for letting us know about it !! :).
-Justin Martin Schmitz wrote: > Hello, > > after downloading and unzipping the jars of GT2.3.4 I noticed that also > many gt2-jars of 2.3.3 are included!! > For example there is a gt2-api-2.3.3.jar and a gt2-api-2.3.4.jar. > The same applies for ALL gt2-... jar-files! > Does this make any sense? > > Do the 2.3.4 jars extend the 2.3.3 jars or do they contain the same classes. > In the latter case: If I include all jars in my classpath (as I do > normally for GT!), do I even use 2.3.4 for my application? > Using the "natural" (lexicographical) order for the files in my > classpath would result in using the 2.3.3 classes because of the higher > priority! > > Is this a bug or (however) a feature? :-)) > > Martin > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users > > !DSPAM:4007,46cc67a2106562458217002! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
