b) is fine, sometimes just a bit more javadocs documention is all that's needed. Thanx gaby
*************************************************************** ** Gabriella Turek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) ** ** PO Box 8602 Christchurch New Zealand +64-3-343-8067 ** *************************************************************** >>>Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/18/07 3:43 pm >>> Okay so we sorted out where the confusion was ... now for the hard part. There are two options: a) change the code mistake so that the featureTypeStyleName value is not passed on to the wrong thing - this would leave the documentation the same - and disable functionality that currently exists b) change the parameter name so it is misfeature's - this would leave the code as is (functionality the same) and document what is going on - this is most useful Which one would be useful for you? Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
