John Cartwright ha scritto: > Hi Jody, > > thanks for your reply and suggestion. The plugin approach for Informix > may work, but we're currently depending on the GeometryConverter > interface to provide a common contract shared between database modules. > Although it appears to me to be unobtrusive to have GT's > org.geotools.data.oracle.sdo.GeometryConverter implement this new > interface, I was hoping to get confirmation from you all that it was OK > and that I wouldn't have to keep maintaining a private branch of GT's to > support this.
Well, I guess the main trouble is that we have no incentive, reason, to merge your geometry converter... it's no use to us, just work, no gain. If you added a datastore using it to gt2, then we would have a reason to add that extra layer of abstraction. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
