Apologies if this appears twice, does not seem to make it through.

I have done a few more tests on the definition of EPSG:3035 in geotools 
(using epsg-hsql.jar).
I can now confirm that the results I am getting from 2.4-SNAPSHOT and 
2.5-SNAPSHOT (using maven) are identical, based on the definition of the 
system as:

PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA",
 GEOGCS["ETRS89",
   DATUM["European Terrestrial Reference System 1989",
     SPHEROID["GRS 1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101, 
AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
     TOWGS84[0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0],
     AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
   PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
   UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
   AXIS["Geodetic latitude", NORTH],
   AXIS["Geodetic longitude", EAST],
   AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
 PROJECTION["Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area", AUTHORITY["EPSG","9820"]],
 PARAMETER["latitude_of_center", 52.0],
 PARAMETER["longitude_of_center", 10.0],
 PARAMETER["false_easting", 4321000.0],
 PARAMETER["false_northing", 3210000.0],
 UNIT["m", 1.0],
 AXIS["Northing", NORTH],
 AXIS["Easting", EAST],
 AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"]]

and the one I am getting from 2.4.0 (local, older jars) is different:
PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA",
GEOGCS["ETRS89",
  DATUM["European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989",
    SPHEROID["GRS 1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101, 
AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
    AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
  PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
  UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
  AXIS["Longitude", EAST],
  AXIS["Latitude", NORTH],
  AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
PROJECTION["Lambert_Azimuthal_Equal_Area"],
PARAMETER["latitude_of_center", 52.0],
PARAMETER["longitude_of_center", 10.0],
PARAMETER["false_easting", 4321000.0],
PARAMETER["false_northing", 3210000.0],
UNIT["m", 1.0],
AXIS["x", EAST],
AXIS["y", NORTH],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"]]

The older definition yields correct results (as in, compatible with 
other products, for instance ESRI stuff and the web tool at 
http://spatialreference.org). It seems that the axes order is switched 
in the more recent database, for whatever reason.
The old definition is consistent with the OGC WKT definition from 
http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3035/:

PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA",
GEOGCS["ETRS89",
DATUM["European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989",
SPHEROID["GRS 
1980",6378137,298.257222101,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
UNIT["metre",1,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],
PROJECTION["Lambert_Azimuthal_Equal_Area"],
PARAMETER["latitude_of_center",52],
PARAMETER["longitude_of_center",10],
PARAMETER["false_easting",4321000],
PARAMETER["false_northing",3210000],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"],
AXIS["X",EAST],
AXIS["Y",NORTH]]

my question about the axis order implementation in EPSG:4326 is still 
unresolved. epsg:hsql assumes a lon/lat ordering and I am fine with 
that, but that is never specified in any of the definitions at 
http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/ .
Thanks
Martin

Martin Tomko wrote:
> Dear all,
> I have a problem with inconsistent result between two independent 
> program requiring projection from WGS84 (EPSG:4326) to EPSG:3035 
> (ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA)
> I have been developing a project using maven to access the 
> 2.4-SNAPSHOT version of geotools. I have been happy with the result 
> until I exported by data and visualized them against some legacy 
> datasets in the EPSG:3035 projection. Mine were shifted away, and I 
> localised the error as switched order of x and y coordinates. I am 
> projecting from WGS84 and I suspected the order of lon/lat could be 
> the problem. While 
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/The+axis+order+issue claims 
> that the standard order for EPSG:4326 is lat,lon and suggests to use 
> the explicit switch of the coordinates to work with lon/lat, this was 
> not the problem, as it seems that the database holds these coordinates 
> as lon/lat!!! (not according to the EPSG standard):
> see
> CoordinateReferenceSystem sourceCRS = CRS.decode("EPSG:4326");
> System.out.println("Source: "+sourceCRS);
> Source: GEOGCS["WGS 84",
>  DATUM["WGS_1984",
>    SPHEROID["WGS 84", 6378137.0, 298.257223563, 
> AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
>    AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
>  PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
>  UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
>  AXIS["Longitude", EAST],
>  AXIS["Latitude", NORTH],
>  AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
>
> Anyway, I changed the order of lon and lat in my input data and tried 
> the conversion to EPSG:3035. The output values were accurate, but in 
> the wrong order - northing, then easting.
>
> Target: PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA",
>  GEOGCS["ETRS89",
>    DATUM["European Terrestrial Reference System 1989",
>      SPHEROID["GRS 1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101, 
> AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
>      TOWGS84[0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0],
>      AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
>    PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
>    UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
>    AXIS["Geodetic latitude", NORTH],
>    AXIS["Geodetic longitude", EAST],
>    AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
>  PROJECTION["Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area", AUTHORITY["EPSG","9820"]],
>  PARAMETER["latitude_of_center", 52.0],
>  PARAMETER["longitude_of_center", 10.0],
>  PARAMETER["false_easting", 4321000.0],
>  PARAMETER["false_northing", 3210000.0],
>  UNIT["m", 1.0],
>  AXIS["Northing", NORTH],
>  AXIS["Easting", EAST],
>  AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"]]
>
> I tried to isolate the behavior and also tried the same in an old code 
> I had, not using maven (just a local copy of gt2-2.4.0). There, the 
> output was correct in EPSG:3035, with ordinate order easting, 
> northing.See the difference in the WKT output!
>
> Target: PROJCS["ETRS89 / ETRS-LAEA",
>  GEOGCS["ETRS89",
>    DATUM["European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989",
>      SPHEROID["GRS 1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101, 
> AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
>      AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
>    PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
>    UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
>    AXIS["Longitude", EAST],
>    AXIS["Latitude", NORTH],
>    AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
>  PROJECTION["Lambert_Azimuthal_Equal_Area"],
>  PARAMETER["latitude_of_center", 52.0],
>  PARAMETER["longitude_of_center", 10.0],
>  PARAMETER["false_easting", 4321000.0],
>  PARAMETER["false_northing", 3210000.0],
>  UNIT["m", 1.0],
>  AXIS["x", EAST],
>  AXIS["y", NORTH],
>  AUTHORITY["EPSG","3035"]]
> The transforms are identical.
>
> The code I use is:
> CoordinateReferenceSystem sourceCRS = CRS.decode("EPSG:4326");//WGS84 
> EPSG code
> CoordinateReferenceSystem targetCRS = CRS.decode("EPSG:3035"); //
> MathTransform transform = CRS.findMathTransform(sourceCRS, 
> targetCRS,true);
> Geometry newgeom = JTS.transform( geom, transform);
>
> I checked, 
> System.out.println(System.getProperty("org.geotools.referencing.forceXY")); 
> returns false, so there are no global effects that I could not trace.
>
> Does anyone have any idea why this may be? Also, what is the proper 
> handling of the axis order in EPSG:4326, that adheres to the EPSG 
> standard?
>
> Thanks
> Martin
>
>
>
>


-- 
Martin Tomko
Postdoctoral Research Assistant 
   
Geographic Information Systems Division
Department of Geography
University of Zurich - Irchel
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

email:  [email protected]
site:   http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~mtomko
mob:    +41-788 629 558
tel:    +41-44-6355256
fax:    +41-44-6356848




-- 
Martin Tomko
Postdoctoral Research Assistant 
    
Geographic Information Systems Division
Department of Geography
University of Zurich - Irchel
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

email:  [email protected]
site:   http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~mtomko
mob:    +41-788 629 558
tel:    +41-44-6355256
fax:    +41-44-6356848


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to