oh, a transformer is still "dirty". I thought it would be an improvement
;) My current implementation is just "hand-made", writing xml tags
directly. So i will keep the xml-xsd framework in mind. Thanks :)

Cheers,
Carsten

Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Yes, implementing a transformer would be one option. The other would be
> to use the xml-xsd framework to generate bindings which are capable of
> parsing and encoding an OWS context object model.
> 
> From an architecture point of view the binding approach has its
> benefits, but if you are looking for a quick and dirty solution i would
> recommend you bang out a transformer for it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to