The GeoTools graph API has been very stable (and has been with us for many years). You will also find some graph code in JTS these days.
One idea that may or may not of occurred to you is to use both; the GeoTools graph library is very flexible and you should be able to write adaptors to hook up to JUNG. We have a long series of grad students making use of the GeoTools graph library; and a series of commercial route finding applications - but so far there have been very little bug reports or anything. It is probably one of the most stable modules in GeoTools. Jody On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Ajit Dharmik<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I am working on an app that allows users to monitor/control flow in a > network, with each node having a location, some other attributes, and logic > that determines the next destination of the flow. Since this requires using > Graphs, I was evaluating JUNG 2 open source API, but recently realized that > GeoTools 2.5.4 also includes API to create/manipulate graphs. This app has a > geo-spatial component definitely, so using GeoTools API through out makes > sense. I'd still like to know if anybody here has experience using both JUNG > and GeoTools graph APIs and if yes, how do these 2 compare with each other > in terms of ease of use and algos for travsering a graph? > Thank a lot in advance. > Ajit > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
