On 2/9/07, Chris Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>

Indeed it would be nice just to have an
official schema for KML.


Like this?
http://code.google.com/apis/kml/schema/kml21.xsd

;) But I don't know if you meaning something more than that.

Barry


best regards,

Chris

Philippe Duchesne wrote:
> isn't that a bit in contradiction with the fact that so far, Google
> hasn't been trying much to harmonize KML with GML, for instance ?
>
> I agree that in many cases KML is a better choice than GML, because of
> GML's complexity. But I feel like it would not have been much of an
> effort to define KML as a subset/profile of GML. And thereby get
> immediate interoperability. Am I wrong here ?
>
> --p.
>
> On 2/8/07, Mike Liebhold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=2399&trv=1
>>
>> A Google View of Data Sharing
>> By Joe Francica
>> Directions Mag
>> (Feb 01, 2007)
>>
>> [snip]
>> "At the Map World Forum in Hyderabad, India, Michael Jones, chief
>> technologist of Google Earth, shared his views on the benefits of
>> standards. Google is an Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) principal
>> member and supports efforts to encourage standards adoption. Google has
>> a "democratized" view of data sharing which begins with the vast amount
>> of information that has already been captured by those working in GIS.
>> Jones believes in ways to provide better access to those data. He
>> explained that most geospatial data today is locked away in
workstations
>> managed by proprietary software. He was perhaps referring to those data
>> controlled by local and state government departments. "We have to
>> envision a future world where data is published," he said. "We may want
>> to knock on the door of the Survey of India and ask them what data they
>> want to share with the world." Jones' vision is to have "all"
geospatial
>> information available to the world and indexed in a way that it can be
>> accessed by those who need it. "Google has a mission to allow more data
>> to be available and interoperable," he said. "
>>
>> .  .  .
>>
>> [snip]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geowanking mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>
> !DSPAM:1003,45cc495934541804284693!
>

--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking





--
Barry

- www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk -
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to