> Why don't archeologists ever actually supply longitude and latitude? That's not hard to explain. They're not interested in J.Random Idiot trampling the site and stripping it of archeological value. Or just hiding it from their fellow researchers so they can publish first.
> In any case, this challenges the idea of 'primitive' or 'natural > state' indians who only made small changes to their environment. It > feels like there was an advanced biotechnics that we cannot see > because of our prejudice. Feh, I don't buy the implied argument about prejudice. > The entire landscape may have consisted of > "anthropogenic" forests; created by humans to fit their needs... and > there may be no "nature" to protect. Turtles, all the way down... _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
