One question that I've never been able to quite clarify:
Can GML express multiple instances of geometry? I would like to express a city building and have multiple instances of that building at different orientations and positions. A document describing my imaginary city should preserve high level abstractions: that the building in it are multiply instanced - rather than "flattening" out to a series of polygons and vertexes in duplicate. I want a succinct transport that models my own human understanding. It appears that this must be possible insofar as that GML itself appears to be a kind of framework notation within which one defines specialized profiles. CityGML for example may have this capability? It's not entirely clear. - a On 6/23/07, Sean Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > Landon Blake wrote: > >> I've written a blog post on the OpenJUMP blog about some of the >> problems with software standards. > > from the post: "I don't want this to be a rant about the OGC and my > problems with how they operate. (I'll save that for another post.)" > > i would like to see that smackdown. > > where is the WHATWG of OGC? an outcome similar > > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061029-8101.html would be ideal. Gregor, The closest thing to the OGC's WHATWG would be the GeoRSS, GeoJSON, and Geo-Web-REST lists. Sean _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
_______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
