Colleagues,

I apologize if you are receiving this more than one time.  It just means we 
subscribe to the same listservs.

I am writing to let you know that last night AidData published the 3.0 version 
of its Global Chinese Development Finance (GCDF) dataset, the 3.0 version of 
its Tracking Underreported Financial Flows (TUFF) methodology, a 415-page Belt 
and Road Reboot report, as well as an accompanying set of materials/resources.  
At the conclusion of this email I describe features/improvements to the new 
dataset and encourage all of you (and your students) to use it in your research 
and teaching.

You can access all of these materials/resources at the links below:

Full report (Chapter 3 on ESG of particular relevance to this group): 
https://docs.aiddata.org/reports/belt-and-road-reboot/Belt_and_Road_Reboot_Full_Report.pdf
Dataset: 
https://www.aiddata.org/data/aiddatas-global-chinese-development-finance-dataset-version-3-0
Methodology: 
https://www.aiddata.org/publications/aiddata-tuff-methodology-version-3-0
Dashboard: https://china.aiddata.org/
Media release: https://www.aiddata.org/blog/belt-and-road-bounces-back
Executive Summary: 
https://docs.aiddata.org/reports/belt-and-road-reboot/Belt_and_Road_Reboot_Executive_Summary.pdf

Many of you are probably familiar with earlier version of AidData's GCDF 
dataset, which has been widely used in the social sciences (see 
https://www.aiddata.org/blog/aiddatas-china-data-wins-2023-best-dataset-award-from-ipes).
 However, the latest (3.0) version of the GCDF dataset includes some new 
features/variables that could be especially useful to quantitatively -- and 
qualitatively -- oriented social scientists. Here's a summary of what is 
new/different:

*         Comprehensive sector and LIC/MIC coverage: The 3.0 dataset provides 
comprehensive coverage of all Chinese grant- and loan-financed projects (worth 
$1.34 trillion) across all sectors and all low-income countries (LICs) and 
middle-income countries (MICs) over 22 commitment years (2000-2021). All 
projects are assigned 3-digit OECD sector codes and ODA/OOF designations to 
enable comparisons with other official sources of international development 
finance.
*         Donor and lender coverage: The 3.0 dataset captures projects 
supported by 791 official sector donors and lenders in China. At the individual 
project/transaction-level, it also identifies the participation of 1,225 
co-financing institutions-including Western commercial banks, multilateral 
development banks, and OECD-DAC development finance institutions that have 
chosen to collaborate or coordinate with Beijing. Another new feature is the 
inclusion of two "flag" variables that allow for easy identification of 
projects that involve (a) non-Chinese financiers or (b) multilateral 
institutions.
*         Borrower and recipient coverage: The 3.0 dataset identifies 5,037 
receiving (borrowing) institutions and categorizes each one by type (government 
agency, state-owned bank, state-owned company, special purpose vehicle/joint 
venture, intergovernmental organization, private sector, etc.), country of 
origin (recipient country, China, or a third country), and, when applicable, 
role (direct borrower or indirect borrower through an on-lending arrangement). 
It also identifies 422 institutions ("accountable agencies") that have 
supported Chinese loan-financed projects and activities by providing repayment 
guarantees, credit insurance policies, and collateral which can be seized in 
the event of default.
*         Financial instrument coverage: The 3.0 dataset allows users to easily 
differentiate between the 10,291 grant-financed projects/activities and 4,776 
loan-financed projects/activities. However, given that Beijing relies on an 
increasingly diverse set of debt instruments to finance its overseas 
development program in LICs and MICs, AidData has also introduced a new loan 
categorization scheme that allows users to isolate 23 specific types of loan 
instruments (project loans, emergency rescue loans, syndicated loans, bilateral 
loans, etc.),
*         Borrowing terms and conditions: There is no other publicly available 
dataset of China's overseas loan commitments with global coverage from 
2000-2021 that identifies borrowing terms and conditions. The 3.0 dataset 
identifies 2,699 interest rates, 3,315 maturity lengths, 1,854 grace periods, 
498 commitment fees, 480 management fees, and 2,537 grant elements across 4,776 
loans in Africa, Asia, Oceania, Eastern and Central Europe, the Middle East, 
and Latin America and the Caribbean. It also identifies 668 loans backed by 
third-party repayment guarantees, 529 loans supported by credit insurance 
policies, and 1,015 loans underpinned by one or more sources of collateral. 
Other new features include the addition of a penalty interest variable, a 
credit insurance fee variable, a first (originally scheduled) loan repayment 
variable, a last (originally scheduled) loan repayment variable, three 
different grant element variables (one based on the 'old' OECD method, one 
based on the 'new' OECD method, and one based on the IMF/World Bank method), 
and a loan-level financial distress flag variable that identifies whether there 
is any narrative evidence (from the 'description' field in the dataset) that 
the borrower had - or is having - difficulty meeting its repayment obligations.
*         Temporal granularity: The 3.0 dataset provides an unprecedented level 
of detail on project commencement (implementation start) dates and project 
completion (implementation end) dates. It identifies precise, calendar 
day-level commencement dates for 11,286 projects and calendar day-level 
completion dates for 11,542 projects. The 3.0 dataset also provides data on the 
originally scheduled project commencement dates and completion dates, which has 
paved the way for the introduction of two new measures ("Deviation from Planned 
Implementation Start Date" and "Deviation from Planned Completion Date") of the 
degree to which projects ran (or are running) ahead of schedule or behind 
schedule.
*         Geospatial coverage and precision. Another important value addition 
is the level of geographical detail regarding where Chinese ODA- and 
OOF-financed projects take place. For 9,497 projects that have physical 
footprints or involve specific locations, the 3.0 dataset extracts point, 
polygon, and line vector data via OpenStreetMap URLs and provides a 
corresponding set of GeoJSON files and geographic precision codes. 72 72% 
(6,919) of these projects include "precise" or "approximate" geocodes; the 
remaining 28% (2,578 projects) are measured at an administrative unit level.
*         Qualitative detail: The 3.0 dataset provides detailed project 
narratives that "tell the story" of each project in the "description" field. 
The average length of each project narrative increased from 144 words in 2.0 
dataset to 169 words in the 3.0 dataset. Whereas the project narratives in the 
2.0 dataset consisted of 1.93 million words (roughly the same number of words 
one would find in 19 full-length books), the project narratives in the 3.0 
dataset consist of 3.48 million words (roughly the same number of words one 
would find in 34 full-length books). Also, the 3.0 dataset is underpinned by 
~148,000 sources in more than a dozen languages, and AidData released all of 
these sources (including thousands of unredacted loan and grant agreements, 
escrow account agreements, rescheduling agreements, deeds of security, share 
pledge agreements, commercial contracts, and forensic audits) last night.

Hope the dataset and the connected products are beneficial to your research and 
teaching.

Very best.

Mike

Michael J. Tierney
Hylton Professor of Government and International Relations
Director, Global Research Institute
(757) 870-3870
Follow Us: LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/school/globalresearchinstitute/> | 
Twitter<https://twitter.com/global_wm>
[email signature]


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/SJ1PR05MB89543E3B86C7D828BF38CFCDB7A9A%40SJ1PR05MB8954.namprd05.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to