Dear colleagues, Just ahead of SB60, I would like to bring your attention to a new article titled, "Equity and Justice in Loss and Damage Finance: A Narrative Review of Catalysts and Obstacles" <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40641-024-00196-6>. Appearing in the journal *Current Climate Change Reports*, the article overviews the history of loss and damage finance, suggests five criteria that could make the Loss and Damage Fund just, and discusses four potential catalysts for just loss and damage finance: (1) ecological and climatic impacts, (2) institutional developments outside the UNFCCC, (3) Global South leadership on debt justice, and (4) legal developments. Please on-share with other colleagues who may be interested.
Regards, Dr Stacy-ann Robinson Colby College <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gep-ed" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gep-ed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CAD9KELpBY-yLQ4zOAO5zqr2gnnFsNFemJsuhzdMXQNpPnfz6hQ%40mail.gmail.com.
