> At the risk of giving poor Sam apoplexy, I think that of all projects, > Geronimo should use GUMP as well (not instead of!).
+1 I had the same thought as soon as I saw the announcement, not only would this test geronimo against its dependancies it would also enable geronimo development to be broken down into the asynchronous development of a number of discrete sub-projects dealing with different areas. I'm assuming that it is going to be impractical to have a huge number of people (judging by the offers of support) working simultaneously on a single big codebase.. d.
