Citando Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Denes wrote: > > > > > > >>-----Mensagem original----- > >>De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Enviada em: sexta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2003 17:56 > >>Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Assunto: Re: RES: Dynamic proxies > >> > >> Ok ... I finaly now have both email addresses in the list :o) > >> > >> One example at a time. > >> > >> 1. Can you define "use" for me ? I think that making a remote call > >> > >> > >to > > > > > >>an > >>EJB deployed in a different EAR constitutes a "use" relationship right > >> > >> > >? > > > > > >>In > >>that case number 1 is not a problem if you consider separate EARs as > >>different applications. Did I miss something ? :o\ > >> > >> > > > >Yes. This is a problem because I want to call the Local, and not the > >Remote Interface of the EJB that is in another EAR. > > > > What is the reason that you need to know that something is local versus > remote? Do you have different technology or administrative domains, > security boundaries, or something else that your dealing with or > something else? > > Stephen.
I can misunderstanding some concepts, but AFAIK: 1. Remote interfaces needs extra 2 interfaces (remote and home) considering that I already have the locals; 2. I canīt have CMP relationships through remote interfaces (Remote interfaces for Entities sounds not like a good idea because of the round-trips, since remote interface normally implies CORBA. (No, I donīt want to implement the Value Object pattern); 3. Could argue that since its in specs, I would like to have the choice... (sorry, canīt resist :) ) Denes ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
