It doesn't matter that much to me. I think we can get by with them separately. What does everyone else think?
--- Jonathan Duty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you want the DDBeans to be part of this module? > ~Jonathan > > Jonathan Duty > Software Developer - eWashtenaw > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Opacki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > deployment verifier) > > I would like to start implementing the DDBeans from > JSR-88. I will start a new thread for JSR-88. > > > > --- Srihari S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cool...so what are we waiting for!!!! > > lets get started with the requirements/design of > the > > verifier.. > > any ideas on the way of working for these phases.. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Duty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:14 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > > deployment verifier) > > > > > > I agree. The verification engine really doesn't > > need to implement the > > deployment specs. Later when we implement the > > DeploymentManager in > > front of it that's when we will have to worry > about > > implementing the > > exact interfaces. > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > Jonathan Duty > > Software Developer - eWashtenaw > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Weston M. Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:48 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > > deployment verifier) > > > > I agree with Srihari in that the Verification > > manager does not have to > > implement the spec interfaces, however, the > > DeploymentManager does, this > > > > would be where we would implment DDRoot, DDConfig > > etc.....in some ways > > the > > DeploymentManager would just use the services of > the > > VerificatinoEngine > > as > > one step in the process of actual deployment. > > > > Is this in line with what you guys were thinking? > > > > > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 01:52 pm, Jonathan > Duty > > wrote: > > > When we implement this module, we could actually > > implement it to > > exactly > > > follow the API specs (JSR 88). That means > > implementing the > > > DeploymentManager interface on top of it and > such. > > That way any > > > application (ant, Eclipse, etc) that is equipped > > to deploy packages > > > could interface with it. It would just fall > short > > of actually > > > communicating with MBeans and deploying the > > package. > > > > > > When this module is used internally (within the > > REAL deployment > > manager) > > > it could just bypass or override the > > Verification's Deployment > > manager. > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Srihari S > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:43 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > > deployment verifier) > > > > > > Hi All > > > When I was going thru the deployment api spec > I > > thought it would be > > > good > > > to bring up some points: > > > > > > From a preliminary reading of the spec i saw > there > > are no apis > > > explicitly > > > designed to do the verification > > > of a deployable unit. From this I infer that the > > verifier can be an > > > internal > > > module which could be used > > > by the deploy tool. So we could go full steam on > > its design and > > > implementation. In this regard I am trying to > > > jot the list of checks that our verifier will > have > > to do (This is > > > mentioned > > > in the j2ee specs). > > > So in a way it will be equivalent to arriving at > > requirement specs for > > > the > > > verifier. > > > With the list of dos and donts that a verifier > has > > to achieve we could > > > go > > > abt with design.Also the design of > > > ant hooks can be taken care.Can we?? > > > > > > Next is something abt the big picture. Certainly > > the verifer is a > > small > > > part > > > of the deployment process. > > > But to achieve compliance we will have to > > implement the deployment > > spec > > > as a > > > whole. Has anyone given > > > thought to this issue? > > > > > > regards > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Weston M. Price > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:33 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: J2EE DeploymentManager ( was J2EE > > deployment verifier) > > > > > > > > > No, I think splitting them up would be good.... > > > > > > Weston > > > > > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:41 pm, Jonathan > Duty > > wrote: > > > > I'm creating a maven module to add to the cvs > > project. > > > > Do we want to plan on the DeploymentManager, > > VerificationEngine, and > > > > DeploymentEngine being in one module? > > > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > > > ~Jonathan > > > > > > > > Weston M. Price wrote: > > > > >Just thought I should start a new thread.... > > > > > > > > > >My KMail was getting dominated! > > > > > > > > > >Weston > > > > > > > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
