Re: [PATCH] JSR77 - 4 managed objects

[gianny DAMOUR]

Hello,
Sean wrotes:
[...]
classes, interfaces, or classes.  I think if this is implemented as 
classes,
it could be a foundation for a reference implementation of a J2EE Server.
[...]
I agree. Did you have a look to the thread "[JSR77] kernel and model glue 
strategy"? I try to explain how JSR77 could be plugged into the current 
kernel without impacting the type hierarchy.

Jeremy, thanks for your comments. It shades some lights - for me at least - 
on the specifications and the "actual" requirements.

> You have also defined the implementation of the relationships between 
the
> managed objects - for example, the implementation of
> J2EEDomainImpl.getServers(). This requires the kernel to ensure that all
> relationships are accurately reflected in these objects rather than 
having
> the implementation here determine that from the true component
> relationship.
I do not understand exactly your point here. However, I hope to submit a 
show case of the proposed strategy very soon.

Cheers,
Gianny
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail : un compte GRATUIT qui vous suit partout et tout le temps ! 
http://g.msn.fr/FR1000/9493