On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 05:21 pm, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

There seem to be three choices on the table so far:
1) commons-sandbox/naming (the one extracted from Tomcat)

This is already available for use...

http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/naming/

I can deploy a snapshot version to Maven's repository if you fancy having a play. Its already used inside Tomcat so it makes a suitable base on which to work.


2) Jetty's

We should probably merge all the good stuff Jan/Greg mentioned into the Jakarta Commons Naming implementation. There might be stuff in Commons Naming we don't need and new stuff we need to add but it looks a reasonable start.



3) OpenEJB's

We can only use the binary distro of this provider. Could someone from OpenEJB compare and contrast this against the other 2 implementations?


James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/



Reply via email to