|
There
are some tests in place already under the
incubator-geronimo\specs\j2ee-connector\src\test directory. However, these
are against the classes that are specified in the spec. Beyond these, as I see
it, one can write all the tests one wants, (as they will be testing the
interfaces) but the more important path of figuring out what's to be done
to make the implementations concrete has to be tread. There are several gaps in
the connector specification that will need to be filled in. These are left out
for the implementation. Further, we need to figure out the axioms for the
system.
1. What can we assume and program against? In other words,
what are the givens and what is it we are trying to accomplish?
2. Are we going to provide hooks to let individual RAs or are
we not going to do any implementation there at all? In fact, what is the purview
of this project vis-a-vis the implementation? Are we going to limit ourselves to
simply implementing the contract from the app server side? I do realize
that providing an implementation for each EIS there is, is hard.
3. The spec does not require that the CCI need be supported.
In the light of this information, are we planning on evolving an API?
4. In any case, we will need to write dummy RAs that will
ensure that our tests run. We will also need to supply other components that
will become a reality eventually when other groups fill in.
I recall having have heard certain other ideas that are
outside the scope of the spec per se but seem to be the responsibility of the
implementation group. I was wondering if anybody can fill me in on
these.
In short, since this is a spec that is pretty much laid out,
with most of the work being done by the third parties or first parties which
ever you feel like calling it, I see little reason for not getting the ball
rolling. This is, of course, my 2 cents, and I could be splashing my ignorance
for all and sundry to wallow in. If that is the case, please enjoy the humor I
provided and don't forget to mail me the check. :)
-k
|
- Newcomers being useful Nick Faiz
- Re: Axioms for JCA implementation kamesh kompella
- Re: Axioms for JCA implementation Richard Monson-Haefel
- Re: Axioms for JCA implementation kamesh kompella
- Re: Axioms for JCA implementation Richard Monson-Haefel
