I verified the files and found missing licenses in BaseEjbBeanBeanInfo.java ContextParamBeanInfo.java EjbLocalRefBeanBeanInfo.java EjbRefBeanBeanInfo.java EntityBeanBeanInfo.java EnvEntryBeanBeanInfo.java JettyWebConnector.java MessageDrivenBeanBeanInfo.java ResourceEnvRefBeanBeanInfo.java ResourceRefBeanBeanInfo.java SecurityRoleRefBeanBeanInfo.java SessionBeanBeanInfo.java
and CRLF issues in DeployerMBean.java MuBooleanTest.java Can someone correct them? Siva ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:38 PM Subject: About patches > This is my personal opinion, but I would prefer patches to be submitted > relative to the project root. Looks like most patches have been, so no > big deal there. However attachments of new files in JAR format are a > pain. ZIP or TAR GZ files would be much easier to handle, with files > relative to the project root. > > Also, it would be nice if you could include the license header and > proper class javadocs too, but that is minor. > > --jason >
