> Surely the basic ideas are the same, though? I was trying to point out that there doesn't have to be a set week for nominations. It is possible to have 100 new committers in the next 10 minutes if a current committer steps up and nominates people and they have the votes.
If you are a committer and you feel someone *deserves* to be a committer just propose them as committer right now! Why wait for some week thats set aside. The only purpose I see to something like that is to motivate the current committers to actually nominate someone. If this is the case this is defeating the purpose of the system. It should be a spontaneous vote based on the merits of the proposed committer. Not "We need 4 new committers, who do we pick?" Ryan
