Well, my ISP has had my email off the air for a day or two, so I wasn't able to read this sooner.

My vote goes with the standard Apache way of doing things, which appears to be Option #2.

As I think Greg Stein pointed out in another posting (I'm still catching up with the list after my email outtage) this project is world wide, across many timezones, so we need to make sure there is enough time for people to respond to votes etc.


Jan


David Blevins wrote:
Oops, vote's closed -- should have read the whole thread first :)

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:23:48PM +0000, David Blevins wrote:

+1 #Option 2

-David

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:21:21AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

With two options on the table, I think we need to put this to bed quickly so
I am calling for a vote between the two following options:

Option #1 from Davanum Srinivas:
  Step #1: 1 week of Nominations.
           Existing committers can nominate new committers by
           sending a note to the dev mailing list.
  Step #2: One of the ASF sponsors consolidates the list of
           nominations and starts a VOTE on the dev
           mailing list. VOTE is open for 1 week.
           Existing committers can use +1/+0/-0/-1 to indicate
           their preference in an email to the dev mailing list.
  Step #3: ASF sponsor conveys the result of the VOTE to the
           incubator PMC and asks for permission to add the new
           committers.

Option #2 from Ryan Ackley:
  Step #1: Any committer can propose someone as a committer at
           any time. The proposing committer generally lists
           their contributions and why they should be made a
           committer.
  Step #2: Any current committer can vote on the new committer.
           The vote is open for 3 days and requires consensus
           ( three +1's and no -1's) as per
           http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/voting.html
           (note this is a different link than Ryan's original)
  Step #3: A positive result is handled as per
           http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/newcommitters.html

We go with whichever option gets the highest score after three days (+1's
less -1's) unless the outcome is obvious.

My vote:
Option #1:
   -0 jboynes - I think we should use a standard process from the
                beginning for all committers rather than a custom one

Option #2:
   +1 jboynes - It's the normal process




Reply via email to