Yeah. This page looks awful, but I'm still glad it's being placed in the wiki instead of in some other distant repository over which we have no control and whose content we cannot be reasonable certain would persist.
The whole *point* of having a wiki is that it's simple to alter and that it manages hyperlink references dynamically. Wikis are perfect for encyclopaedias. The content and the comments lying "under the hood" on this page should be cleaned up as well. The wiki doesn't need to be polluted with junk: (TestDef te|tes|yy <B> blabla</b> <a href="">this is a test link</a>) And so on. Please Emerson, could you pull the content out, save a copy of it locally, wipe the slate clean at that wiki page and begin adding the content in small chunks until you get the hang of the wiki? I'm sure we'd all appreciate the effort. (I can hear Jason's nostrils flaring all the way from Minnesota : ) -- N. Alex Rupp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emerson Cargnin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 10:51 PM Subject: Re: suggestion : geronimo babylon dictionary for developers > I thought it would be better at cvs, but... > > BTW, you think the page is not well formatted (my fault) or the data (a > dictionary source) is not well suited to be there? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 10:41 PM > Subject: Re: suggestion : geronimo babylon dictionary for developers > > > > This page is not properly formatter for moin wiki syntax. > > > > --jason
