Sorry to be obtuse, but does that mean: a) Drools already does this or b) It might be interesting to enable drools to run with Geronimo?
Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:26 AM Subject: Re: JSR94 > On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 04:23 pm, Ludovic Ma�tre wrote: > > I'm pretty new to the Geronimo project but perhaps peoples want to use > > drools from codehaus since it is developed by some of the developer of > > geronimo, ins't it ? > > Agreed - drools rocks > > http://drools.codehaus.org/ > > > > Chris Perrin wrote: > > > >> Because the JSR94 spec clearly specifies the use of J2EE as a target > >> for > >> running a rules engine, has anyone given any thoughts for providing a > >> rules > >> engine implementation that runs natively in Geronimo? > >> > >> Obviously something like this would be a service that the user would > >> have to > >> configure, but it might be useful to Geronimo users to have a JSR94 > >> compliant rules engine ready to go "out of the box." If we ensured > >> strict > >> JSR94 compliance, then we could keep people from locking into a > >> Geronimo-specific implementation if they wanted to migrate to another > >> platform. The rules engine might also have a standalone component > >> which > >> someone could use if they thought a Geronimo might be overkill for > >> some > >> projects. > >> > >> If anyone thinks this is a worthwhile idea, I'll start cranking out > >> some > >> code. > > Why not just contribute to drools? > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >
