James, I agree with the statement that rules engine needs to interact with the other components, but I was more thinking of allowing a developer access to a drools instance for use in his/her programs.
Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:23 PM Subject: Re: JSR94 > > On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 09:16 pm, Chris Perrin wrote: > > > Here's my basic thought. It sounds like the more important thing is > > to get > > Drools running under JCA for Geronimo to use. Once that has occurred, > > it > > should be fairly simple to expose the rules engine for deployed > > software to > > use. Thoughts? > > Yes - though I'd say its probably the other way around. The rule engine > monitors & controls the components all by itself. The components don't > need to be particularly aware of the rules engine (unless certain > components really want to). The rules engine needs to be able to see & > control & interact with the components - not the other way around. > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >
