On 24 Nov 2003, at 01:26, David Blevins wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 05:47:40PM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Currently the interceptor stack is built from the front backwards
using
the addInterceptor method on the container.
I would like to propose we change to build the stack in the opposite
order, from the back forward. This would allow us to make the next
interceptor a private final initialized in the Interceptor's
constructor. It also makes multi-headed interceptor chains easier to
understand which will help with OpenEJB integration, and simplifies
the
code in the containers that builds the stacks.
+1
I'll note for others reading that with the current front-back
(first-last) style of building the stack makes it impossible to add
another interceptor later -- it would actually end up after the
"final" interceptor in the chain and would never be invoked. Putting
the final/end interceptor in the stack first allows you to keep adding
interceptors in front of it.
+1
Sounds convincing to me.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
